Tuesday, 30 June 2026

The Hancocks Pt 2: Robert & Prudence, Generations of Endurance

The Hancocks Part 2: Robert & Prudence, Generations of Endurance

This story is part 2 of my family line that lived in Cornwall until Samuel Hancock and Elizabeth (nee Menear) migrated to Australia in 1876. Robert and Prudence lived a long life in St Austell, Cornwall during the volatile times of the mid 1600s to mid 1700s.

Robert Hancock and Prudence Clements

Robert Hancock, my seventh great-grandfather, was baptised at Holy Trinity Church on 12 March 1661 in the parish of St Austell, Cornwall.1  He was born into a world still unsettled by one of the most violent upheavals in English history. The English Civil War, or Great Rebellion, had torn the kingdom apart between 1642 and 1651, claiming an estimated 200,000 lives, or roughly four percent of the population.

Cornwall had stood firmly for the Crown, contributing men and resources to the Royalist cause with remarkable loyalty. Even after Parliament’s decisive victory at Naseby in 1645, resistance in the county continued. The execution of Charles I in 1649 shattered long-held beliefs in the divine right of kings, and for eleven years England existed without a monarch.

The consequences of war lingered long after the fighting ended. Parliamentary troops occupied Cornwall in 1646, dismantling its military strength and partially destroying strongholds such as Restormel, Launceston, and Tintagel. Royalist families faced heavy fines, and the established social order began to shift. The gentry who had led Cornwall’s resistance saw their influence weakened, while ordinary men who had fought for the king discovered that loyalty offered little protection in defeat.

The restoration of Charles II in 1660 brought celebration, but also a quiet unease. The past decade had proven that kings could fall, that Parliament could rule, and that ordinary people could challenge traditional authority. Robert grew up in a society where these ideas were no longer unthinkable, and where memories of war remained vivid in the stories of family and neighbours.

Amid this uncertainty, the Hancock family endured. Robert’s parents survived the years of conflict, occupation, and hardship, and managed to preserve their position. When his mother, Grace, died in 1679, her will carefully provided for each of her children, ensuring they could continue the family’s work as tinners and yeomen and maintain a measure of stability in an unpredictable world.2 

Proof version of John Speed's 1611/12 map of Cornwall, which closely followed the Saxton map of 1576 in offering a much more accurate and detailed depiction of the county, but includes additional settlements, rivers and other details. Courtesy of  caitlingreen.org

Robert's Inheritance and Path to Independence

Robert was just eleven years old when his father, Thomas, died in 1672.3  The responsibility for the household fell to his mother, Grace, who managed the family’s land, livestock, and mining interests over the following seven years. Before his father’s death, Robert would already have begun learning the skills essential to a tinner and yeoman—how to read the landscape for “shodes” (tin-stones), how to work the moorland streams for streaming tin, and how to tend the family’s acre of land and its livestock.

An anonymous Cornishman, writing in 1671—the year before Thomas’s death—captured the craft of the tinner in vivid detail:

"Where we suspect any mines to be, we diligently search that hill and countrey, its situation, the earth or grewt, its colour, and nature, and what sort of stones it yields… After any great land flood (in which it is supposed there are some new frets made in the sides of the banks), we go and diligently observe such frets … to see if, happily, we can discover any metallic stones in the sides or bottoms thereof."

The suspected stone would then be “vanned”—crushed on a shovel and washed until the heavier grains of tin were revealed. This was more than a trade; it was a way of life passed from father to son over generations, requiring patience, skill, and a close reading of the land.

When Grace died in 1679, Robert had reached eighteen. Her will set out a carefully structured inheritance: 45 shillings in cash, a suit of leather working clothes, and one head of cattle, loaned interest-free for three years. This was not simply provision, but preparation. The 45 shillings—about £2 5s 0d—was enough to secure a leasehold under the Duchy of Cornwall’s “Three-Lives” system, the foundation of many yeoman livelihoods. The cow offered both immediate productivity and security, while the leather clothing equipped him for the physical demands of tin work. Together, these provisions gave Robert the means to begin establishing himself as an independent yeoman. (To read more about her will and estate)

He did not marry immediately. Though eighteen in 1679, Robert waited until 1691—nearly twelve years—to marry Prudence Clements, when he was twenty-nine. This delay reflects a practical reality of the time: a young man needed to secure land, build up stock, and establish his standing before supporting a household. In these intervening years, Robert likely worked alongside his brothers, sharing labour and resources as each gradually built their own livelihood. By the time of his marriage, he had achieved the stability required to begin a family.

The Tinner's World: From Thomas to Robert

Cornwall’s tin industry underwent gradual but important changes between the generations of Thomas Hancock and his son Robert. In 1663, a new coinage town was established at Lostwithiel, adding to an administrative system that had governed the tin trade for centuries. Tin from the St Austell area was likely taken to Lostwithiel, the nearest stannary and long-established administrative centre on the River Fowey.

A coinage town was a designated centre where all locally produced tin had to be inspected, taxed, and stamped before it could be legally sold. This process, known as tin coinage, had been in place since at least 1156, making it one of the oldest forms of taxation in England. The term “coinage” did not refer to minting money, but to the act of stamping the tin as proof that the duty had been paid.

Once a tinner had refined his tin into blocks, he was required to transport them to one of these towns. There, a Duchy official known as a “prover” would cut away the corners to test the quality of the metal. If the tin met the required standard and the duty—set at four shillings per hundredweight since the reign of Edward I—was paid, the blocks were stamped with the Duchy seal and cleared for sale.

Coinage days were held quarterly, drawing tinners and merchants from across the region. For families like the Hancocks, these journeys would have been a familiar part of working life, linking their smallholding on Hensbarrow Downs to the wider network of Cornish trade. By 1778, the historian Pryce observed that Lostwithiel alone was coining more tin each quarter than several other towns had once managed in an entire year, reflecting the gradual westward shift of the industry.

Beyond the mines, Cornwall’s social and physical landscape was also evolving. A growing “middling sort” of lawyers, traders, and merchants was emerging, though much of the county remained rural and relatively isolated. St Austell itself was still modest in Robert’s time. In the reign of Henry VIII, the antiquary John Leland had described it as “a poor village,” and it was not noted as significant by either Carew or Norden. Its later growth owed much to its proximity to the nearby mines at Polgooth and elsewhere. Although the parish was expanding during Robert’s lifetime, it would not become a “considerable thoroughfare” until the main road from Plymouth to Land’s End was routed through it around 1760.

A rare glimpse of Cornwall at the end of the seventeenth century comes from the traveller Celia Fiennes, who journeyed through the region on horseback in 1698. She described narrow, tree-lined lanes, steep hills, and towns with streets “very close.” Roads were often in poor condition, with deep ruts and potholes that made travel slow and difficult. Yet she also noted the landscape’s beauty, observing that in many places one might ride “as if in a Grove,” with regular rows of trees lining each side of the road.

By the 1690s, newspapers were beginning to reach Cornwall, and literacy was slowly increasing. Even so, for most tinners like Robert, the world remained largely local—shaped by the parish church, the moorland bounds, the coinage town, and the enduring rhythms of the Stannary courts that governed their ancient trade.

Marriage to Prudence Clements

By the time Robert had secured his footing as an independent yeoman, he was ready to establish a household of his own. On 2 March 1691, he married Prudence Clements at Holy Trinity Church in St Austell.4  She was twenty-two years old, having been baptised there on 29 August 1668,5  while Robert was twenty-nine.

Prudence was the daughter of Thomas and Elizabeth Clements. Thomas was likely born in the nearby parish of St Blazey in 1632.6 No marriage record has been found, and the only baptism records located for the couple are Prudence in 1668—when Thomas would have been thirty-six—and a son Thomas in 1671, who may have died in 1673.7  Her father died in either 1684 when Prudence was sixteen, or 1693 when she was twenty-five.8 

Elizabeth Clements died in 1676, when Prudence was just seven years old.9  Who helped raised her after her mother’s death is uncertain. When Prudence was fourteen, her father may have married Marjorie Grigg in 1682.10  (I cannot be certain this record is for her father or another person with the same name.) If he did remarry, the arrangement may have altered her place in the household and the opportunities available to her. As the only daughter, she would no longer have been expected to run her father’s household, and she would have been freer to marry once she came of age. I have ordered the scan of the probate and will documents for Thomas Clemence, Tinner of St Austell who died in 1684, to determine if this record relates to him.

Robert and Prudence’s marriage marked the beginning of a long and productive partnership, rooted in the rhythms of parish life and sustained by the skills and stability Robert had spent years building. Together, they raised a large family:

  • Elizabeth Hancock (1692–1692).
  • John Hancock (1693–?).
  • William Hancock (1695–1730).
  • Robert Hancock (1698–1768) — married Rebecca Mufford (my direct ancestor).
  • Grace Hancock (1700–1785).
  • Thomas Hancock (1702–1744).
  • Richard Hancock (1704–1783) — married Mary Nicholls (also my direct ancestors).
  • Oliver Hancock (1707–1740).
  • Jane Hancock (1711–?).
  • John Hancock (1715–?).11 

Several of these children lived to adulthood and established families of their own. Robert, my direct ancestor, married Rebecca Mufford in 1728. Richard married Mary Nicholls in 172912  and is also a direct ancestor. Not all, however, enjoyed long lives—Elizabeth died as an infant, Oliver at thirty-one, and William at 35, would have been a heavy loss for parents who themselves lived into old age. Such experiences were part of the fabric of family life, shaping a resilience passed from one generation to the next.

During these years, the parish of St Austell continued to grow. Holy Trinity Church, rebuilt in the late fifteenth century and often described as “a bible in stone,” stood at the centre of community life. Its carvings of the Holy Trinity, the apostles, and Irish saints reflected a long religious tradition, while within its walls the milestones of daily life—baptisms, marriages, and burials—were faithfully recorded. It was here that Robert and Prudence’s family story unfolded, one entry at a time.

St Austell was developing into a more prospeous town from the mid 1600s - as seen in this 1830's image. See the Holy Trinity Church, Allom Antique Print 1830

A Lifetime of Witness

Robert and Prudence’s story, like that of many families of their time, was not marked by dramatic events but by endurance. Robert died in 1743 or 1744 at around eighty-two years of age. Prudence lived even longer, reaching eighty-four before her burial on 16 April 1753.

Across their lifetimes, they witnessed profound change. Cornwall’s economy continued its gradual shift toward mining, while the wider nation experienced political and social transformation. They lived through the reigns of six monarchs—Charles II, James II, William III and Mary II, Anne, George I, and George II—as well as the Glorious Revolution, the Acts of Union, and the Jacobite risings. What had been uncertainty in Robert’s childhood became, over time, a more settled but still evolving world.

Yet their greatest achievement was continuity. They raised children who could sustain themselves, maintained the family’s place within the parish, and passed on the practical skills and values that had carried them through uncertain times.

When Prudence died, her great-grandson Thomas Hancock—my sixth great-grandfather—was eleven years old. He would have known her and Robert, and would have heard stories shaped by memory and experience. Through them, the family’s living memory stretched back to a Cornwall marked by upheaval, adaptation, and endurance. That inheritance was more than lineage; it was a tradition of perseverance, quietly handed down, shaping how later generations understood both their past and themselves.

Sources, Notes, & Further Reading

Notes:

To find records labelled Kresen Kernow, go to Kresen Kernow - Cornwall Archives, then search the record number

To find records labelled opc, go to Cornwall OPC Database, then do a manual search for the record based on the information provided in the note.

freepages.rootsweb.com link will take you directly to the specific record page.

My ancestry family tree for genealogical sources is also available to view: https://www.ancestry.com.au/invite-ui/accept?token=2NQi6YrG-SmftSXLJLZQV1w-gTbxWAqNrkWQa0xBCuM=

1 OPC, Baptisms, Robert Hancock, 1661-1662.

2 Kresen Kernow, record number AP/H/1952

3 freepages.rootsweb.com, 3 Nov 1671.
For Probate record, Kresen Kernow, record number AP/H/1708

4 freepages.rootsweb.com, Clements.

5 freepages.rootsweb.com, Clemence (common spelling variation).

6 OPC, Baptisms, Thomas Clemence, 1632-1632.

7 For Prudence's baptism: freepages.rootsweb.com, Clemence (common spelling variation).
For Thomas's baptism: opc, baptism, 1671-1672, Thomas Clemence & burial: opc, burial, 1673-1674, Thomas Clemence.

8 For 1684 Probate & Will documents: Kresen Kernow, record number AP/C/1915
For 1693 burial: opc, burial, 1693-1694, Thomas Clements.

9 OPC, Burial, Elizabeth Clemence, 1676-1677.

10 Marriage record freereg.org.uk

11 Baptism records on freereg.org.uk

12 Marriage records on freepages.rootsweb.com

General Sources:

The Williams Family Tree – Robert Hancock and Prudence Clements family;
Wikisource – VCH Cornwall 1, Tin Mining Methods;
Wikisource – The Parochial History of Cornwall, St Austell;
Daniel Defoe, A Tour Thro' the Whole Island of Great Britain (1724–1727);
Celia Fiennes, Journeys (c. 1698);
The Tinners Grievances (1697) by Thomas Tresilian;
History of Parliament Online – Cornwall;
FreeREG – Holy Trinity, St Austell parish registers;
FamilySearch – St Austell, Cornwall, England Genealogy;
Kresen Kernow Archives;
Wikipedia – Tin coinage;
Caitlingreen.org – Some Interesting early maps of Cornwall.

Part 3 of the Hancocks in Cornwall will look at the lives of Robert Hancock & Rebecca Mufford

Monday, 29 June 2026

Grace Hancock’s Will and Probate of 1679

Family Story

Grace Hancock's Will and Probate of 1679

This story examines the contents and implications of Thomas and Grace Hancock's wills and probate.

Grace Hancock's Will: A Widow's Legacy

In 1679, in the parish of St Austell, Cornwall, an elderly widow named Grace Hancock lay on her deathbed and dictated her final wishes. She then made her mark on the will and the wax seal was carfully placed near her mark. Her words offer us a rare and precious glimpse into her world—a world she had navigated as a wife, mother, and widow in 17th-century Cornwall.

Portion of Grace Hancock’s Will. Her mark is the t shape next to the seal.

Born around 1628, likely in St Austell, Grace married Thomas Hancock sometime before 1650. Theirs was a union that bridged the chaos of the English Civil War, a period when many parish records were lost or poorly kept. Together, they built a life in the shadow of Hensbarrow Downs, where the granite moors met the sky.

Thomas was a tinner—but not the downtrodden labourer of Victorian imagination. As a "yeoman-tinner," he was part of an ancient and privileged class. Operating under Cornwall's independent Stannary system, he and his sons were independent capitalists. They worked their own "tin bounds" on the moor, streaming tin from the gravel of riverbeds, and paid only a small portion of their earnings to the lord of the soil. They were sturdy, self-reliant, and occupied a respected place in the middle tier of Cornish society.

The Hancock household was a careful blend of industry and agriculture. As "yeoman-tinners," when the summer sun dried up the moorland streams, they seamlessly shifted their focus back to their agricultural smallholding.

Their home was likely a classic Cornish longhouse—a dwelling where the family and their livestock shared a single roof. The hearth was the heart of the home, providing warmth and a place to cook the simple fare of pasties and broth. The cottage would have been furnished with the necessities of rural life: a sturdy table, wooden stools, a spinning wheel, and perhaps a few cherished possessions—a pewter plate, a brass pot, or a treasured bible.

Grace's world revolved around the management of this household. She was responsible for the dairy, the poultry, the garden, and the endless cycle of spinning, brewing, and preserving. She was also the family's nurse, midwife, and first teacher. She would have taught her children the skills required to run an efficient household, and would have assisted in farming duties when required also.

The Ordeal of Widowhood

Thomas died in 1672. The legal doctrine of coverture meant that, as a married woman, Grace had held no independent legal identity. Her property, her earnings, and even her children were, in law, her husband's. Widowhood, while a time of grief and vulnerability, also brought a profound and startling liberation.

As a widow, Grace regained her legal personhood. She could now hold property in her own name, make contracts, and manage her own affairs. Her will is the ultimate expression of this regained agency—a document in which she, a woman, could dispose of her property according to her own wishes.

Grace lived for seven more years after Thomas's death. During this time, she managed the land and resources he had left, ensured her younger children were cared for, and maintained the family's place in the community. Her son Robert, my seventh great-grandfather, was only eighteen when his mother died, and the family's ability to remain respectable and independent is a testament to Grace's prudent management.

The Legacy She Left Behind: The 1679 Will and Inventory

Grace's will details the careful distribution of her worldly goods. The bequests were not just about money; they were about memory, continuity, and belonging. Below is the inventory of her estate, which offers a remarkable snapshot of the family's economic standing:

Item Value (£:s:d) Historical Context & Family Significance
One house, garden, and one acre of land 5:0:0 The family cottage and freehold/leasehold land; passed directly to her eldest son as executor.
Three packhorses 3:0:0 Vital for a Cornwall tinning family; used to carry heavy sacks of raw tin ore from the mines to the blowing houses.
Four swine (pigs) / heifers 0:10:0 Basic smallholding livestock used for self-sufficiency, clearing land, and winter meat.
Two fully equipped beds 1:0:0 Includes the wooden bedstocks, feather mattresses, blankets, bolsters, and sheets. Highly valued heirlooms.
One brass cooking pot and pan 1:0:0 Heavy metal cookware. Notice it is valued the same as two full beds; metal was incredibly scarce and precious.
One press (linen cupboard) 0:10:0 A large, heavy wooden wardrobe used to keep valuable clothing and bed linens safe from dampness and mice.
Six pewter dishes 0:5:0 High-quality tableware made of a tin-lead alloy. A proud nod to her late husband Thomas's trade as a tinner.
One dining table (board & trestle) and benches 0:5:0 A classic 17th-century dining setup: a long wooden board resting on a frame, paired with long benches (forms).
Things unuseful / omitted 0:2:0 A standard legal catch-all for minor items, broken tools, or old rags not worth valuing individually.
TOTAL VALUE 11:15:0 Successfully preserved her late husband's 1671 wealth (£12 9s 5d) throughout her entire widowhood.

This inventory paints a picture of a comfortable yeoman farmer's household. The total value of £11 15s 0d, equivalent to approximately $4,000–$4,800 AUD in modern consumer purchasing power, indicates that the Hancocks were by no means impoverished. They were a solidly middle-class family within their rural community.

Specific Bequests in the Will

Grace's will distributed her possessions among her children with careful consideration:

  • To daughters Jane and Margaret: "Littol blak Coro"—likely a little black cow, or a protective black coral or jet charm/pendant, highly valued in the 1600s for warding off illness and evil spirits.
  • To Jane: a furnished bed, cooking pot, storage chest, spinning wheel, old carts, and 20 shillings.
  • To sons William and Samson: a pig (littol Jafor?), a cauldron (groater crok), and forty shillings each.
  • To daughter Tamsin and her son William: 10 shillings.
  • To son Robert: 45 shillings, one suit of leather work clothes, and one head of cattle as an interest-free loan for three years.
  • To son John: her home, goods, and chattels not otherwise bequeathed, and he is appointed executor.
  • To daughter Margaret: 40 shillings.

A Calculated Inheritance: Robert's Path to Yeoman Status

At first glance, the 45 shillings (£2 5s 0d) bequeathed to Robert might seem modest. However, this sum was strategically calculated to launch a young man into the yeoman class—the very status to which his father Thomas had belonged.

To be legally defined as a yeoman in the 17th century, a man traditionally needed to own freehold land worth at least 40 shillings of annual rental value. The purchase price for such land, however, was typically "20 years' purchase"—meaning if a plot generated 40 shillings of rent per year, buying it outright would cost approximately 800 shillings (£40). The 45-shilling loan covered only a tiny fraction of a freehold purchase and could not buy land outright.

Instead, Robert's inheritance was perfectly structured to secure a Duchy of Cornwall "Three-Lives" Lease—the primary way Cornish yeomen built their wealth without vast capital. Under this system:

  • A tenant would pay a one-time upfront cash lump sum (called a premium or fine) to a major landlord, such as the Duchy of Cornwall.
  • This upfront payment secured the land for the duration of three named lives—typically the young man, his wife, and his firstborn child.
  • Once the premium was paid, the ongoing annual rent was purely nominal—often just a few pence or a shilling a year.

Leases for three lives were common on Duchy and church lands, and "farms were in general very small" in the mining districts, consisting chiefly of "cottage holdings". Paying a 40-shilling premium for a leasehold cottage and an acre of ground gave a family absolute security for decades. Families holding these secure, lucrative leases were universally regarded, respected, and recorded as yeomen by the local parish, even though the ultimate freehold title belonged to the Crown or a lord.

Grace's clever structuring of Robert's inheritance provided him with a complete "business kit" for launching into the yeoman class:

  • 45 shillings in cash — The perfect amount to serve as the upfront premium on a three-lives lease.
  • One head of cattle — Livestock to graze the leased land and provide dairy, meat, and breeding stock.
  • A suit of leather work clothes — Durable clothing for working the land and the mines.

This was an interest-free loan for three years—not a gift. The loan structure gave Robert immediate collateral to secure a local leasehold without overwhelming him with debt, while also providing the livestock to work it and the clothing to work in. It was a calculated, practical inheritance designed to give her son a foothold in the independent yeoman class that both his parents had occupied.

Grace left her mark (a curved T-shape) with a seal on top (an anchor within a circle). The witness was Samson Crapp, likely her brother or cousin.

Unravelling the Kinship Network: The Crapp Family Connection

A meticulous review of the primary legal documents left by the Hancock family reveals an undeniable, multi-generational reliance on the Crapp family of St Austell, establishing a clear "Kinship Network" that points to a biological connection.

The Witness/Appraiser Testimony

  • 1671 (Thomas Hancock's Will): A Peter Crapp serves as an official asset appraiser/witness to the estate inventory.
  • 1679 (Grace Hancock's Will): The same Peter Crapp returns to act as an appraiser for Grace's estate. Concurrently, a Samson Crapp (written phonetically by the scribe as Samson Cragg/Crago) steps in as the primary legal witness to Grace's final deathbed text.

Genealogical Rule: In the 1600s, widows and vulnerable families did not select random neighbours to appraise or witness their most valuable family assets. Legally binding probate responsibilities were almost exclusively entrusted to close blood relatives—specifically brothers, fathers, or maternal uncles—to protect the children's inheritance from fraud.

The Timeline & Onomastic Link (Naming Patterns)

Parish register reconstruction reveals a highly compatible, localized family structure matching the exact timeline of Grace's life:

  • The Ancestral Line: A Peter Crapp (b. 1588 in Menheniot, d. 1670) migrated toward the mining hubs of mid-Cornwall. His son, Peter Crapp (b. 1629), would be exactly 42 years old in 1671 and 50 years old in 1679—the precise prime age for a respected male householder to be called upon by church courts to legally appraise the Hancock family estates.
  • The St Austell Breakthrough: A Samson Crapp is recorded actively having children in St Austell right at the time of Grace's projected birth window, registering daughters Johan in 1627 and an unnamed/unreadable daughter in 1628, which may be Grace herself.
📜 New Discovery

I have recently discovered that a Sampson Crapp was granted probate in 1676 in St Austell. This discovery is discussed in his story.

Other Key Individuals Named in the Wills

The witnesses and other individuals mentioned in Grace's will provide further clues about her social network:

  • Samson Verran / Verrant (1679 Witness): Written phonetically as "Farrs" using the double-lowercase "f" script for a "V". He signed with a flawless, unembellished capital "P" mark. This neat initial points to his professional role as a Stannary Purser—the official bookkeeper of the local tin mines.
  • John Anstis & Charles Arscott (1671 Witnesses): Witnessed Thomas Hancock's will. John Anstis was a renowned Cornish gentleman and Archdeaconry Court Registrar (whose son became the Garter King of Arms). His presence explains the highly precise, uniform clerical handwriting on both documents.
  • Peter Crapp: As noted, a central figure in both wills. WikiTree records show a Peter Crapp (b. 1629, Menheniot) died in St Austell in 1712. His son, Peter Jr., was baptised in St Austell in 1664.

Portion of Thomas Hanock’s will. Note the covered seals, this was a common practice to protect the seals.

Conclusion: A Matriarch's Enduring Gift

Grace Hancock died in 1679, the year her will was proved. She had lived through the upheaval of the Civil War, the daily hardships of a life on the Cornish moors, the death of her husband, and the responsibility of raising her children alone. She did not leave behind a fortune in gold or silver. Instead, she left something more valuable: a family equipped to survive.

Her children, who inherited her resilience and her knowledge of both farming and tinning, would carry on. Robert, her son and my ancestor, inherited the tools of the tinner and the knowledge of the land—and, crucially, the means to secure a leasehold that would give him a foothold in the yeoman class. This legacy would sustain his own family for generations.

The story of Thomas and Grace Hancock is one of quiet endurance. In the shadow of moorstone walls and beneath the shelter of towering hedgerows, they laid the foundations of a family that would weather centuries. Grace's will is not just a legal document; it is her final act as a matriarch, a woman who ensured her family's future by bequeathing to them the most important thing of all: their name, their heritage, and their home in this harsh yet beautiful corner of Cornwall.

Related Stories:

A Cornish Inheritance: The Hancock's Part 1

A Man of Substance: The Will and Legacy of Sampson Crapp

Sources for This Story:
Wills and probate inventories of Grace Hancock (1679) and Thomas Hancock (1671) — Kresen Kernow records AP/H/1952 & AP/H/1708
Cornwall parish registers (St Austell);
Duchy of Cornwall lease records and legislation (1672, 1700);
Encyclopaedia Britannica, 7th Edition — entry on Cornwall, Duchy leases, and land tenure;
Princeton University Library collections on John Anstis;
Cornish mining history resources.

Thursday, 11 June 2026

The Hancocks Part 1: A Cornish Inheritance

The Hancocks Part 1: A Cornish Inheritance

Thomas & Grace Hancock (About 1620-1679)

This story is part 1 of my family line that lived in Cornwall until Samuel Hancock and Elizabeth (nee Menear) migrated to Australia in 1876. We begin in the 1600s with Thomas and Grace Hancock in St Austell, Cornwall.

Wednesday, 10 June 2026

Roots in Lincolnshire Part 4: Christopher Farr Junior & The Gilbert Family

ANCESTORS OF CHRISTOPHER FARR JUNIOR& ELIZABETH GILBERT

Roots in Linconshire Pt 4 - Christopher Farr & the Gilbert Family

This story is part 4 of my family line that lived in Lincolnshire until Christopher and Elizabeth (nee Gilbert) Farr migrated to Australia. Includes the stories of Elizabeth’s ancestors back to the late 1700s. I recommend you read part 1, part 2 and part 3 prior to reading this family story.

Monday, 8 June 2026

Roots in Lincolnshire Part 3: Christopher Farr & the Johnsons

ANCESTORS OF CHRISTOPHER FARR & ELIZABETH GILBERT

Roots in Linconshire Pt 3 - Christopher Farr & the Johnson Family

This story is part 3 of my family line that lived in Lincolnshire until Christopher and Elizabeth Farr migrated to Australia. It includes the stories of the Johnson family back to the late 1700s. I recommend you read part 1 and part 2 prior to reading this family story.

Thursday, 4 June 2026

Roots in Linconshire Pt 2 - Ann Timberland & John Farr

ANCESTORS OF CHRISTOPHER FARR & ELIZABETH GILBERT

Roots in Linconshire Pt 2 - Ann Timberland & John Farr

This story is part 2 of my family line that lived in Lincolnshire until Christopher and Elizabeth Farr migrated to Australia. It includes the histories of the Timberland families back to the late 1700s. I recommend you read part one prior to reading this family story.

Tuesday, 2 June 2026

Roots in Lincolnshire - Anthony Timberland & Dinah Hall

Ancestors of Christopher Farr & Elizabeth Gilbert

Roots in Lincolnshire

Anthony Timberland & Dinah Hall

The diagram above shows my direct Lincolnshire ancestors, whose lives were shaped by poverty, loss, and endurance. Their stories are rooted in the damp, fertile earth of Lincolnshire, where people lived close to the seasons and to the success or failure of the harvest.

The earliest ancestors I can trace with reasonable confidence are Anthony Timberland and Dinah Hall, my sixth great‑grandparents. They married at St Andrew’s Church, Folkingham, on 14 July 1733. The parish register gives us no parents, no ages, and no clues to their origins, so their beginnings remain uncertain. One possibility is that Anthony was the Anthony Timberland baptised at Helpringham in 1679, but that identification remains unproven and should be treated as a working theory rather than established fact.

Most Popular